PROP
17

Proposition 017 - ACA 6 (resolution chapter 24), mccarty. elections: disqualification of electors.

Proposition 017 - ACA 6 (resolution chapter 24), mccarty. elections: disqualification of electors.

Summary

Restores voting rights upon completion of prison term to persons who have been disqualified from voting while serving a prison term. Fiscal Impact: Annual county costs, likely in the hundreds of thousands of dollars statewide, for voter registration and ballot materials. One-time state costs, likely in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, for voter registration cards and systems.

Money Raised

Chart depicts total fundraising by all committees primarily formed for and against Prop 17.Totals are updated daily with contributions from Power Search opens new window and adjustments from the most recent Political Reform Division analysis. opens new window

Largest Contributions

Showing the 10 largest contributions to committees formed primarily for and against Prop 17 in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot. Contributions in earlier election cycles and contributions between allied committees are excluded. For more information on funding for ballot measure campaigns, visit the Power Search opens new window campaign finance search engine.

Yes on Prop 17

AltaMed Health Services Corp.
12/31/2020
$314,865
Quillin, Patty
09/21/2020
$250,000
Pritzker, Susan
08/20/2020
$200,000
AltaMed Health Services Corp.
09/06/2020
$168,135
ACLU of Northern California Issues Committee
09/11/2020
$100,000
The Heising-Simons Action Fund
09/25/2020
$100,000
Opportunity for All Coalition
11/11/2020
$45,000
California Nurses Association PAC (CNA-PAC)
07/27/2020
$30,000
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters Political Action Fund
07/27/2020
$30,000
SEIU United Healthcare Workers West PAC
08/31/2020
$30,000

No on Prop 17

No contributions have been reported to the No on 17 campaign in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot.

What your vote means

Yes

A YES vote on this measure means: People on state parole who are U.S. citizens, residents of California, and at least 18 years of age would be able to vote, if they register to vote.

No

A NO vote on this measure means: People on state parole would continue to be unable to vote in California.

More on Proposition 17

For background on Proposition 17, an analysis by the legislative analyst, endorsements for and against the measure, and more...

Arguments

Pro

Prop. 17 restores a citizen’s right to vote after they finish their prison term—aligning California with other states. A recent parole commission report found that citizens who complete their prison terms and have their voting rights restored are less likely to commit future crimes. Yes on Prop. 17.

Con

Vote NO on Proposition 17 because it: • Amends California’s Constitution to grant violent criminals the right to vote before completing their sentence including parole. • Allows criminals convicted of murder, rape and child molestation to vote before paying their debt to society. • Denies justice to crime victims.

Campaigns

For

Dana Williamson
1787 Tribute Road, Suite K
Sacramento, CA 95815
(916) 382-4686
|YesonProp17@gmail.com
Yeson17.vote

Against

Ruth Weiss
Election Integrity Project California
27943 Seco Canyon Rd. #521
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
ruthweiss@eip-ca.com
www.eip-ca.com