PROP
4

Repeals Prohibition Against Public Funding of Election Campaigns. Legislative Statute.

Repeals Prohibition Against Public Funding of Election Campaigns. Legislative Statute.

Summary

Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs. Supporters: League of Women Voters of CA; California Nurses Association; Mental Health Advocacy; Social Security Works; Consumer Watchdog Opponents: California Taxpayers Assn; Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn; Family Business Assn of California; United Latinos Action

Money Raised

Chart depicts total fundraising by all committees primarily formed for and against Prop 4.Totals are updated daily with contributions from Power Search opens new window and adjustments from the most recent Political Reform Division analysis. opens new window

Largest Contributions

Showing the 10 largest contributions to committees formed primarily for and against Prop 4 in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot. Contributions in earlier election cycles and contributions between allied committees are excluded. For more information on funding for ballot measure campaigns, visit the Power Search opens new window campaign finance search engine.

Yes on Prop 4

No contributions have been reported to the Yes on 4 campaign in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot.

No on Prop 4

No contributions have been reported to the No on 4 campaign in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot.

What your vote means

Yes

A YES vote on this measure means: State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for public office candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used, how the public funds could be used, and who could receive them.

No

A NO vote on this measure means: State and most local governments would remain unable to create public campaign finance programs for public office candidates.

More on Proposition 4

For background on Proposition 4, an analysis by the legislative analyst, endorsements for and against the measure, and more...

Arguments

Pro

YES ON 4. California is the ONLY state that bans public funding of campaigns— communities in all other 49 states have this right. Special interests want to keep the ban to protect their power. Prop. 4 removes it. Strict taxpayer safeguards. Vote YES: Elections should be won, not bought.

Con

Prop. 4 allows politicians to use YOUR taxpayer money to fund their negative campaigns. Prop. 4 has NO LIMIT on the number of candidates who can get taxpayer money and NO LIMIT on how much taxpayer money they can get. Worse yet, Prop. 4 allows SPECIAL INTEREST MONEY IN POLITICS. NO ON PROP. 4.

Campaigns

For

Yes on Proposition 4,
Californians for Fair
Elections, sponsored by
Government Reform
Advocates
info@CAFairElections.org
www.CAFairElections.org

Against

California Taxpayers
Association
www.caltax.org/prop4