PROP
3

AUTHORIZES BONDS TO FUND PROJECTS FOR WATER SUPPLY AND QUALITY, WATERSHED, FISH, WILDLIFE, WATER CONVEYANCE, AND GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AND STORAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

AUTHORIZES BONDS TO FUND PROJECTS FOR WATER SUPPLY AND QUALITY, WATERSHED, FISH, WILDLIFE, WATER CONVEYANCE, AND GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AND STORAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

Summary

Authorizes $8.877 billion in state general obligation bonds for various infrastructure projects. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging $430 million per year over 40 years. Local government savings for water-related projects, likely averaging a couple hundred million dollars annually over the next few decades.

Money Raised

Chart depicts total fundraising by all committees primarily formed for and against Prop 3.Totals are updated daily with contributions from Power Search opens new window and adjustments from the most recent Political Reform Division analysis. opens new window

Largest Contributions

Showing the 10 largest contributions to committees formed primarily for and against Prop 3 in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot. Contributions in earlier election cycles and contributions between allied committees are excluded. For more information on funding for ballot measure campaigns, visit the Power Search opens new window campaign finance search engine.

Yes on Prop 3

Western Growers
08/09/2018
$200,000
California Waterfowl Association
09/21/2018
$120,000
California Wildlife Foundation Vesta Fund
08/23/2017
$100,000
California Rice Industry Association
09/15/2017
$100,000
California Waterfowl Association
09/15/2017
$100,000
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.
09/25/2017
$100,000
Ducks Unlimited, Inc.
10/10/2017
$100,000
Cummings Trust A, William C.
11/13/2017
$100,000
California Waterfowl Association
11/16/2017
$100,000
California Wildlife Foundation Vesta Fund
05/23/2018
$100,000

No on Prop 3

No contributions have been reported to the No on 3 campaign in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot.

What your vote means

Yes

A YES vote on this measure means: The state could sell $8.9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund various water and environmental projects.

No

A NO vote on this measure means: The state could not sell $8.9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund various water and environmental projects.

More on Proposition 3

For background on Proposition 3, an analysis by the legislative analyst, endorsements for and against the measure, and more...

Arguments

Pro

YES ON 3 secures safe, reliable, and clean water for California. YES ON 3 provides safe drinking water; repairs unsafe dams; provides drought protection; improves water quality in our ocean, bays, and rivers; and captures, treats, and reuses stormwater. YES ON 3 provides water for people, farms, and the environment.

Con

Prop. 3 gives money to lots of organizations. That's the whole idea. But it will not produce one drop of new, usable water. Interest payments on the bonds will double the amount that has to be repaid to bond holders. Think about it . . . seriously. Vote NO.

Campaigns

For

Jerry Meral
P.O. Box 1103
Inverness, CA 94937
(415) 717-8412
jerrymeral@gmail.com

Against

John F. Takeuchi
Central Solano Citizen/
Taxpayer Group
P.O. Box 3532
Fairfield, CA 94533
(707) 422-4491
taksan@comcast.net
www.thetaxwatchers.org