Quick Guide to Propositions
Requires That Certain New Transportation Revenues Be Used for Transportation Purposes. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.
Requires That Certain New Transportation Revenues Be Used for Transportation Purposes. Legislative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary
Requires that certain revenues generated by a 2017 transportation funding law be used only for transportation purposes and generally prohibits Legislature from diverting funds to other purposes. Fiscal Impact: No direct effect on the amount of state and local revenues or costs but could affect how some monies are spent.
Money Raised
Chart depicts total fundraising by all committees primarily formed for and against Prop 69.Totals are updated daily with contributions from Power Search 
and adjustments from the most recent Political Reform Division analysis.
Largest Contributions
Showing the 10 largest contributions to committees formed primarily for and against Prop 69 in the election cycle when it appeared on the ballot. Contributions in earlier election cycles and contributions between allied committees are excluded. For more information on funding for ballot measure campaigns, visit the Power Search campaign finance search engine.
Yes on Prop 69
10/12/2018
08/03/2018
08/21/2018
05/01/2018
05/07/2018
06/29/2018
08/03/2018
08/03/2018
08/03/2018
08/29/2018
No on Prop 69
What your vote means
Yes
A YES vote on this measure means: The Legislature will be required under the State Constitution to continue to spend revenues from recently enacted fuel taxes and vehicle fees on transportation purposes (such as repairing roads and improving transit).
No
A NO vote on this measure means: The Legislature in the future could change current law, allowing it to spend a portion of the revenues from recently enacted fuel taxes and vehicle fees on purposes other than transportation.
More on Proposition 69
For background on Proposition 69, an analysis by the legislative analyst, endorsements for and against the measure, and more...
- Read the California Voter Information Guide.
Arguments
Pro
Prop. 69 guarantees existing transportation taxes can ONLY be used for transportation improvement projects. It prevents the legislature from redirecting these funds for non-transportation purposes. Prop. 69 protects taxpayers. Does NOT raise taxes. Supported by League of Women Voters California, California Chamber of Commerce, California NAACP, Congress of California Seniors.
Con
Sacramento’s broken promises have led to a rundown, outdated, and congested transportation system throughout California. Proposition 69 protects transportation money that will not fix or build any new roads. Proposition 69 fails to protect more than $1 Billion in gas tax revenues. Vote NO on Proposition 69.
Campaigns
For
- Coalition to Protect Local Transportation Improvements
- (866) 285-9833
- info@YesProp69.com
- YesProp69.com
Against
- Katie Masingale California State Assembly, Office of Assemblyman Frank Bigelow
- California State Capitol, Suite 4158
- Sacramento, CA 95814
- (916) 319-2005
- Katie.Masingale@asm.ca.gov
- ASM.CA.GOV/Bigelow